In Some Societies The Number Of Crimes Committed By Teenagers Is Growing | Band 9 IELTS Essay Sample

In some societies the number of crimes committed by teenagers is growing. Some people think that regardless of age, teenagers who commit major crimes should receive adult punishment. To what extent do you agree?

Here is a band 9 IELTS essay on this topic written by one of our students. Need help with IELTS writing? Get your IELTS essays, letters and reports corrected by me.

Band 9 IELTS essay sample

Criminal tendencies have nothing to do with age. It is observed that the number of juveniles committing serious crimes is on the rise. Some people opine that teenagers committing heinous crimes should receive the same punishment as adults. I fully agree with this view. When teen offenders are treated like adults and given the same punishment, it will be a lesson for other teens contemplating crime.

First of all, the age of the offender is irrelevant in the case of grave crimes like murder or rape. Many teenage criminals these days are not afraid of the consequences of their act since most states currently protect them under the Child Protection Law and give them only light punishments. For example they are asked to do community service for 6 months or put in rehabilitation centres for just about a year for misdeeds likes robbery. Juveniles committing major offences are also treated rather leniently. Unfortunately, this sends the wrong message and encourages more teens to commit crime. Therefore it is paramount to give severe punishments to teen offenders so that neither they nor their peers will want to commit crimes again.

Secondly, if a child is old enough to commit a heinous crime, he should definitely be considered old enough to be punished as well. This is vital to reduce the number of repeat crimes committed by these individuals. According to a survey by the Harvard University, countries that award severe punishments for all criminals regardless of their age had a significantly lower juvenile crime rate than the countries that protect children from receiving adult punishments. This is the reason why it is crucial to treat teen offenders just like adults.

In conclusion, the problem of growing juvenile crime can only be tackled by awarding them punishments in accordance with the gravity of the offence that they committed.

Do you have an essay on this topic? Submit it below in the comments for a free band score estimate.

Manjusha Nambiar

Hi, I'm Manjusha. This is my blog where I give IELTS preparation tips.

8 Responses

  1. Jihoon Kim says:

    The number of crimes committed by teenagers has increased all over the world needless to say the level of them. Therefore, this controversy has been a center of attention in media and the public have shown their interests. Even though there are still societal responsibilities to prevent those crimes from happening in the first place, I strongly believe the necessary amendment should be made with top priority for teens to receive adult punishments.
    It has been true schools and each parent have some level of responsibility and some improvement must be followed here and there. It is mainly because more than 70 percentage of teenage criminals have gone through violence and bullies and poverty either from schools or their houses growing up according to statistics. Thus, the opinion makes a sense of itself that many crimes would have not happened in the first place if some needed actions and measures by those institutions and monitoring with care and love had been.
    However, I strongly believe it can’t wait until the crimes have decreased any longer and time to turn it around. While more investment and societal cares and interests have been made toward teenagers with colour and who grow below poverty line, almost equal level of strong punishment must be given to a teenage criminal to minimize and prevent it from happening in the first place with two reasons. Firstly, it is known that they find strong punishment more fearful and can actually stop themselves because they already predict horrible consequences of what they will do. Secondly, it should be taken lightly most of victims are teenagers and teenagers are old and have a long enough education experience to make judgement on their behaviors.

  2. Ayaan says:

    Crime rates have an exponential increase on a daily basis, and it is argued that the punishment level should be the same for all people, whether they are youngsters or adults. This essay disagrees with the idea because teenagers have immature evaluation criteria in their minds, and laws ought to be appealed in a justified way, not equal. Therefore, this essay will firstly mention the mental incompetency of a child, and secondly, will extend the idea regarding the impact of the education on the youth for defending the argument.

    Judges give a sentence to a guilty person depending on the subject of a crime and the age; however, the criteria of the age should be prioritized because of the ability of a decision-making process. That is to say that teenagers are prone to make mistakes due to ignoring the consequences of negative behavior. For instance, a student desires to make a joke to one of a friend by hiding his valuable item, and he does not realize that it was a crime at the end. Therefore, he will face some troubles with that event on that day and in the future as a consequence.

    In addition to weak decision capacity, they have more capabilities in education rather than adults. For this reason, teaching them whole truth ought to be prioritized over punishment for the youth as comparing older ones. Moreover, a child could be learned the thief as a legal job from his family, and he pretends to do the same behavior as if it was a reasonable condition. A teenager who sentenced for a five year was released after the judge who decided to educate him for a five-year-period in Bangladesh due to the correction of the wrong behavior thought by the family.

    In conclusion, the crime percentages are increasing exponentially regardless of age or gender. Besides, young people should take different provision than adults, because of higher abilities for education and having an immature judgment.

  3. Tamilarasu says:

    In some countries, there is a growing tendency of juvenile delinquency, and some individuals perceive that irrespective of age, everyone should be treated as same. Although receiving the adult punishments may bring down the number of crimes committed by the teenagers, it is not wise to compare the punishments made by an adult with teenagers as they are not matured enough to understand their crime.

    Fear of punishment will certainly bring down crimes committed by younger people. Having a common punishment will instill fear in the minds of teenagers. They will think that if mistakes are made, certainly they might have to face the consequences. As a result, they will not get involved in cruel acts which eventually lead to a decrease in the number of crimes committed. In Saudi Arabia, all individuals are treated in the same way in front of the law, so no one could receive special treatment.

    But does that mean that all the crimes should be treated in the same way? Teenagers are immature; they may not realize the fact that they have made a crime, so we cannot treat them under the same trail as that of adults. By doing so, the Justice is being denied to innocent teenagers. Therefore, they should be treated separately. For example, in India, teenagers are sent to rehabilitation camps so that they get adequate counseling and support from the government and that they could realize their mistakes, start a new life rather than undergoing years of imprisonment for mistakes that are committed without realizing it.

    In conclusion, by treating both adults and teenagers crimes as same we could minimize the unlawful acts to a certain extent, but due to their immaturity, it is important to consider their future life and treat the youngsters separately.

  4. Supinder says:

    With an increasing number of people eating fast food which if to eat regularly can cause health issues some people think that the only solution is ban is completely.To what extent do you agree?

    In recent times,growing population is eating junk food on regular basis and it can lead to various health issues,a few individuals believe that the key to solving this issues is to ban it completely.In my opinion, while I agree it causes health problems , it should not be completely banned.
    The primary reason is consuming fast food on daily basis will leads different health problems as it contains lots of preservatives and fat .It can mainly cause person to become overweight .Now, more people buy because it is a easily in every shop at reasonable prices .Moreover, fast food contains lots of sugar due to this individuals gets many diseases such as diabetes, high cholesterol and major problem is obesity , especially in youngsters .For instance ,WHO proves that nowadays people are getting very sick and more and more people dying owing to eating fast food on daily basis
    It should not be completely banned, however. Fast food causes many health problems if we eat it on regular basis ,but if we eat it once or twice in a month we will not have any disease and why we eat once or twice beacause sometime people get bored by eating home cooked food so, that time it becomes necessary fo them to change their taste, especially offspring they get easily bored. Also, government should conduct a awareness program in schools , universities and other places .In which they should tell the disadvantage of fast food while eating it on regular basis and told them that they can eat fast food but should be eaten in moderation. As a result, banning is not a solution to tackle this issue.
    In conclusion ,eating more fast food cause many health problems such as obesity , diabetes and so on ,but banning these product is not the right solution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *