Some People Believe Charity Organizations Should Only Offer Help To People Of Their Own Countries | Band 9 IELTS Essay Sample

Some people believe charity organizations should only offer help to people of their own countries. Others claim that these organizations should give aid to people in great need wherever they live. Discuss both opinions and tell which side do you agree?

Here is a band 9 IELTS essay on this topic. Need help with IELTS writing? Get your IELTS essays, letters and reports corrected by me.Do you have difficulty writing a discuss both sides essay? Watch our video to learn about the correct structure of this type of IELTS essays.

Band 9 IELTS essay sample

According to some people, charities should help only those people who live within their national boundaries; however, others opine that they should provide assistance everywhere. In my opinion, it depends on the mission of the organization and its resources. Well-funded charities can offer help everywhere; those that are short of resources should prioritize their own people.

On the one hand, if NGOs decide to serve only the people of their country, we cannot quite blame them. After all, their resources come from the local people and as such when this money is utilized for the benefit of the locals, it is fully justified. Charitable work focusing on local issues also satisfies donors who are eager to see a resolution to the problems affecting their country or community. Also, many charitable organizations have limited resources. For example, charities operating in poor countries are often short of resources. They cannot provide help abroad. If they attempt to do this, they will only antagonize the local community that funds their initiatives.

On the other hand, there are many international organizations flush with cash and other resources. For instance, UNICEF is an international organization which aims to aid children worldwide. They receive funding from affluent countries and hence they are quite capable of offering assistance in any part of the world. There are several such organizations that have the backing of developed countries. It is their moral and constitutional responsibility to provide assistance to needy people everywhere.

To conclude, charities should work with the objective of helping the needy. Who they should help or where they should provide help depends on their financial situation and objectives.

Do you have an essay on this topic? Submit it below in the comments for a free band score estimate.

Manjusha Nambiar

Hi, I'm Manjusha. This is my blog where I give IELTS preparation tips.

8 Responses

  1. Sukhvir says:

    Here is my essay:

    It is considered by some that the donation organizations consider their localites to provide assistance whereas others opine that they should extend their help without any border limits. In my opinion, these groups should offer the required support if they have the resources.

    On the one hand, many humanitarian authorities prefer to assist their local people due to various reasons. Firstly, they believe that it is better to utilize the money from where it comes from.Their residents have paid the taxes and they have the precedence over the foreigners. Another reason behind it is that this can positively affect the crime rate. The more the poor and unemployed individuals of their country are supported by them, the less they indulge themselves in criminal activities. With this, their citizens will have safer living conditions. The similar case has been reported in Tehran where regional charities provided a remarkable budget for shanty areas and as an impact rate of armed robbery declined considerably.
    On the other hand, various donation corporations are flooded with extravagant funds. Therefore, they are fully equipped with the resources that they can use in favor of other needy nations. In addition, they have financial backing from various developed countries and hence it is their moral devoir to provide help wherever required. For instance, Red Cross, an international community group which protects victims of conflicts worldwide.
    In conclusion, although there are valid justifications why local communities should get the preference, it is still more reasonable to lend hand by the affluent organizations.

  2. Sam says:

    People have different opinions about whether the approach of charity organisations ought to be limited to their own nation or to all over the globe where there is a need. While, there are some benefits of working in a particular country, I believe that there should be no boundaries to lend a helping hand to the people in need.

    On the one hand when charity foundations work in their own nation, it becomes possible to execute the plans more precisely and accurately on the ground level. Because there are more number of workers who are connected to such organisations in the different parts of the country and can help more needy people.There are so many such organisations working in my country, India, like being human by Salman Khan, you we can by former cricketer Yuvraj Singh, Khalsa foundation. You we can foundation, for instance, works in India, they help the cancer patients who cannot afford treatment and other medical facilities. According to a report this foundation has helped around 20,000 patients in India. Therefore ,it is more precise and fruitful for charity organisations to work within the country.

    On the other hand, for the sake of humanity, charity organisations should help people in need regardless of their country. As there are no such organisations in many of the underdeveloped nations and people in such countries are reeling under hazardous ailments. Moreover, when charity foundations works in other parts of the globe, it spreads positive message among the people and helps to strengthen the bond with other countries. For example, when tsunami hit in the countries like Indonesia, whole world came together to help and donated money, food packages, medical equipment. These things unites the whole world. Obviously, charity organisations should offer help to people in every nook and corner of the world.

    In Conclusion, it is more practical when charity organisations works within the country. However, as humanitarian, every possible help should be provided to the people in need wherever they live

  3. Harsh says:

    In conclusion, even though charity organisations of developed countries could help any person, I believe that it would less feasible for organisations of under developed and developing countries to do the same. Hence, they should help people of their own country solely.

    • ielts practice says:

      In conclusion, even though well-funded international organisations can help anyone and everyone, I believe that it would be less feasible for organisations in under developed and developing countries to do the same. Hence, they should mainly help people of their own country.

      • Harsh says:

        People have different opinions about whether charity organisations ought to lend helping hand to their own nation or any part of the world. While Charity organisations of developed nations should help people of any nationality, I believe that help of organisations of developing or underdeveloped countries should exclusively for their own people.

        On the one hand, charity Institutions of developed countries generally have adequate amount of funds to cover the areas of needy people all across the world. These institutions are usually financed by the elites that make them able to render any kind of help, be it a medical educational or any other at any corner of the world. Also, people of well developed nations are mostly backed up by their government and there are a few people who need support. For instance, only 10% of people of the USA are deprived of basic amenities, which is very less as compared to the figure of underdeveloped nations. Hence, it would be imperative for these organisations to provide resources irrespective of people’s country.

        On the other hand, NGOs run by the people of developing or underdeveloped countries already have limited resources. However, the proportion of people in need is far more. In the country, India, for instance, there are people who neither have bread to eat nor shelter to live in. If these organisations help foreigners, it would be outright unjustified for my country. So, they should indeed prioritise people of their country. In addition to this, they should also save money to be used in unforeseen situations. For instance, the current situation, when the nation has been suffering from COVID-19 these organisations are providing huge amount of money and other facilities to needy people that not only reduce the burden of government but also decreases the probability of declining the economy of the country. This is possible only when they have limited their resources for their own country.

        In conclusion, even though charity organisations of developed countries could help any person, I believe that it would less feasible for organisations of under developed and developing countries to do the same. Hence, they should help people of their own country solely.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *