IELTS essay sample about shootouts and liberal gun laws
Essay topic
In some countries, the number of shooting massacres is on the rise because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Sample response
The crime rate in any society has a strong association with the number of guns possessed by its people. If more people possess guns, obviously the crime rate will also increase. Advocates of gun ownership might disagree, but in my opinion, gun control will make a society safer.
Supporters of widespread gun use argue that having guns at one’s disposal will enhance one’s safety. Also, in their opinion, gun ownership is an important civil right. They argue that tackling crime by banning guns is not possible because criminals carry them around all the time. In such a scenario, if ordinary people do not have access to guns, they might be at a loss. This argument might sound logical but it is not because strict gun laws will make them inaccessible to criminals as well. Some of them also argue that ban on gun ownership will prevent sportsmen and hunters from practicing their hobbies. However, in my opinion, none of these are valid reasons to permit the widespread of guns.
In any community, saving lives should be the first priority. Since guns pose a major threat to people’s lives, they must be banned. Mass shooting massacres have occurred several times in the US, a country where just about anyone can own guns. These massacres were an obvious example of the hazardous ramifications of unwise gun laws. Some reports have also shown that domestic crimes decline dramatically when guns are inaccessible. Many crimes are committed in the heat of the moment. When the offender can’t find the gun easily, they might get time to cool down and a helpless life could be saved.
To sum up, despite the calls for widespread use of guns, in my opinion, strict gun laws will make the society safer by keeping firearms out of reach of both criminals and law-abiding citizens.
