The Government Should Make A Better Network For Public Transport | Band 9 IELTS Essay Sample
Cities are now expanding; should the government make a better network for public transport or should they build more roads to facilitate car ownership? To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Here is a band 9 IELTS essay on this topic. Need help with IELTS writing? Get your writing samples corrected by me.
Band 9 IELTS essay sample
More and more people are migrating to cities in search of better job opportunities and lifestyle. The expansion of cities, unfortunately, causes many problems. Traffic congestion is one of them. Some people argue that building better transport networks is the most effective way to solve this problem. Others insist that the government should build more roads to make way for the growing number of private vehicles. In my opinion, both measures are required to tackle the traffic problems plaguing large cities.
Improving public transport is unarguably the most effective way to make cities more livable. When buses and trains run on time and provide connectivity all over the city, few people will want to drive their own vehicles. This will automatically reduce the number of private vehicles on the road. When there are fewer cars on the road, there will be no traffic jams. Another advantage of having fewer vehicles on the road is that air quality will automatically improve. Respiratory problems caused by air pollution affect almost everyone living in the cities and a reliable public transport system will help everyone breathe easily.
Building more roads and improving existing infrastructure is also important. More roads enhance connectivity and in most cases they also reduce the distance between two parts of the city and thus reduce travelling time. Another advantage of building more roads is that it will reduce road mishaps and save many lives.
In conclusion, improving the frequency and reliability of public transport is definitely one way of resolving traffic issues affecting metropolises. Building more roads is another measure worth considering.
Do you have an essay on this topic? Submit it below in the comments for a free band score estimate.
Cities are now expanding; should the government make a better network for public transport or should they build more roads to facilitate car ownership? To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, over-population has become a prevalent concern in many countries around the world which stems to many severe problems like traffic congestion, deforestation etc. It is often argued that the government should invest in road infrastructure to facilitate car ownership. However, I believe that rather the government should invest more on the better network of public transport and will provide the justifications and evidence to validate my viewpoint in the below essay.
To begin with, there are numerous benefits to making an effective network of public transport in the cities. Firstly, Public transport like metro, buses, sharing cabs and trains would perhaps reduce down the number of private vehicles on the roads and thus reduces the problem of traffic congestion in the city. Moreover, it can save a significant amount of fuels which is often wasted on the traffic signals. Secondly, public transport saves a great amount of time and money for the public especially for the middle and poor section of the society. For instance, local train in Mumbai is the economical and effective way of public transport which saves a lot of time for its commuters.
Nevertheless, few people also argued that the government should build more roads to facilitate car ownership. This phenomenon I believe is very detrimental to our natural environment. It is often seen that thousand of big trees is usually cut to enlarge roads and encroachment of green areas for parking the vehicles. Moreover, if there is an increase in the number of cars on the road would perhaps result in more dependency on natural fuel which would disturb the ecological balance of nature.
To recapitulate, after analyzing the above scenario, it is not very hard to come on the consensus that government should invest on to build the better network of public transport because it reduces the traffic congestion and promotes greenery in the cities.
Take care of grammar mistakes. This seems band 6.5 to me.
Thanks for your feedback.
Can you please share a few grammatical mistakes in the above essay so that I can take care next time.
Would you like to use our writing correction service?
Can you please upload the sample essay for the below topic:
Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than making individuals responsible for that. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples.
Nowadays, there is dire need to tackle the various environmental issues which are plaguing our planet. This prevalent phenomenon has brought all stakeholders of the society together to take collective measures to reverse the environmental damages without indulging into blame games. I believe this approach would very helpful to take strict actions against various environmental related problems.
To begin with, it is true that conserving and protecting the natural resources are unarguably an inevitable issue in the society which should be address by the both Government as well as big companies. There are numerous instances in society nowadays where the big companies with the support of government have taken stupendous initiatives to protect the environment. Firstly, many big companies with the collaboration of local municipal bodies encourage the recycling of human waste like paper, glasses, metals and other recycled material. This phenomenon helps in reducing the dependency of human being on nature.
Secondly, the Government promotes the usage of renewable source of energies like solar, wind, and bio. It provides huge subsidiaries and tax rebates to the companies who are proving and facilitate the production of such renewable energy which increases the number of players in this sector. Without the support of the government, this industry would never able to survive because installing and maintenance of solar panels and giant windmills require a heavy investment and various environmental clearances.
After analyzing the above scenario it is not very hard to come on the consensus that it is very important for the government and big companies to work collectively to find the solutions of various environmental issues. It is the responsibility of all stakeholders in society to conserve the natural resources and ensure their existence for the future generation.
This seems band 6.5 to me.
I have a model response for this topic here: https://www.ielts-practice.org/governments-and-companies-should-work-together-to-reverse-environmental-damage-band-9-ielts-essay-sample/