Some People Think That GM Foods Can Solve Food Scarcity | Band 8 IELTS essay sample
With a growing world population one of the pressing issues is that of feeding such a large number of people. Some people think that GM foods offer a viable solution to this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Here is a band 8 essay on this topic submitted by one of our students. Send us your writing samples for a free band score estimate or get a detailed analysis of your writing for a fee.
Band 8 IELTS essay sample
As the world population is rising, meeting the dietary needs of all people has become a matter of concern. Some people argue that growing more genetically modified food can tackle this issue. In my opinion, GM foods can solve this issue to a great extent but there are some other solutions as well for this problem.
Genetic engineering can be used for increasing the food production. By changing the DNA structure, people can make crops more disease and pest resistant. When crops are not destroyed by diseases and pest, the yield will be more. In addition to this, more desirable features can be added to crops by genetic engineering. For example, by using genetic modification we can grow bigger fruits or vegetables. Nutritional value of crops could also be increased by genetically modifying the crops.
However, GM crops have some drawbacks and depending more on them is not the right solution to this problem. When crops are manipulated to increase yield, certain natural nutritional contents may be lost and also, people may get allergies by consuming these kinds of foods. Because of these reasons it is unwise to depend too much on them. A better solution is to encourage all people to grow their food. If each family can grow enough food for themselves, food scarcity will not be a problem at all. If this is made a legal obligation, people can eat naturally grown healthy food and their nutritional requirements will be met.
In conclusion, GM foods can certainly solve the food scarcity to a great extent. However, they are not the only solution. Instead of depending on GM food bought from the market, people should try to grow their own food in their backyard.
Following water, food is the second argument to help us survive in life, but the huge number of individuals may trigger the shortage of nutrients. Because of this fact, today it is highly debatable whether the concept of scientifically producing foods is the best feasible approach or not. Accepting there is no other chance, I agree with this claim without a doubt.
Since the requirements for nourishments proliferated, scientists developed a GM food theme. That was a great scientific approach due to the fact that people had more chances to purchase things for eating. Now, the demands for nutrients are met easily by food-making companies rather than it is in the past. A further advantage of GM is affordability for nourishments. Customers may sometimes complain about the expensiveness of original foods, not containing supplemented chemicals. If we take into consideration people are mostly interested in affordable things, that might be another reason why genetic modification of food plays a very essential role in human life, especially in terms of the slumps in prices.
In addition to the former part, it is inevitable that other creatures can benefit from the crops farmers grow. Harmful insects, for example, are the most significant enemies for those who burgeon harvest, and the concept of GM foods can prevent this issue. Moreover, decayable nutrients are not what food industries seek. With GM, it is possible to prolong the period of perishing by rising to 1-2 years. Drawing it out can also pave the way for the avoidance of waste of wood.
On the whole, I have merely touched the beneficial aspects of this approach because it is what humanity needs. Until 2050, it is projected that the world requirements for nourishments can significantly escalate, and in this case, we will need GM foods more than it is today.
This seems band 6.5 to me.