Some People Think That City Governments Should Spend More Money To Promote Bicycle Use | Band 7.5 IELTS Essay Sample

Some people  think  that  city governments  should  spend  more  money  to promote  bicycle  use  in  cities.  Others,  however,  believe  that  cities  should  focus on  investing  in  public  transportation  systems like  trains  or  buses.  Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Here is a band 7.5 IELTS essay on this topic submitted by one of our students. Need help with IELTS writing? Get your IELTS essays, letters and reports corrected by me.

Band 7.5 IELTS essay samples

While some people think that the local administration should increase funding to encourage bicycle use among citizens, others opine that more emphasis ought to be given to strengthening the public transport networks. In my opinion, the authorities should take both measures to improve the traffic situation in cities.

On the one hand, some people believe that the state should spend money to motivate bicycle use as it is healthy and environment friendly. When people are encouraged to use bicycles as the primary mode of transport pollution and consumption of fossil fuels will come down. To illustrate this, as the majority of people are using bicycles in Melbourne, the amount of particulate matter in air is very low according to a recent survey by the state. Furthermore, it is observed that when more people start using the bicycle the society becomes healthier. As cycling is a good physical activity, people who regularly use bicycle to commute stay healthy and this will motivate others to adopt this practice.

 On the other hand, others contend that improving public transport networks through enhanced funding by the state will save time and reduce traffic congestion in cities. An efficient and affordable transport system is considered a boon to office goers and ordinary people as it saves much time which is very vital in their busy work schedule. So it is the responsibility of the state to allocate more funds for building an efficient public transport system. A clear example of this is the metro train service in Chennai which has efficiently reduced the travel time by half for people travelling on it. Moreover, the provision of a good transport system in the cities helps to control the traffic congestion which is considered to be a mounting issue in most cities due to urbanisation and population outburst.

To sum up, after analysing the situation, it is not hard to see that both approaches have their merits. In my opinion, the government should encourage cycling and at the same time it should invest more in public transport systems.

Do you have an essay on this topic? Submit it below in the comments for a free band score estimate.

Want to improve your English grammar?

Your grammar mistakes could be lowering your score in the writing module. Want to avoid those mistakes? My grammar eBook English Grammar and Usage addresses common problem points in English. It is an easy reference book with entries arranged in alphabetical order. Buy it for just $3.99.

Manjusha Nambiar

Hi, I'm Manjusha. This is my blog where I give IELTS preparation tips.

2 Responses

  1. seema says:

    ion systems like trains or buses. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
    Most of the people think that authorities have to spend fund to raise awareness about the bicycles, whilst, some other think that the fund should be utilized on the public transport system like trains, buses, etc. This essay will discuss both the opinions with relevant reasons and examples and will then concludes with my personal view.
    On one side, there are several reasons by which people are compelling the government to use the revenue to promote the use of bicycle. First and foremost is safe to the environment. This means the cycles are not producing any obnoxious gases or any pollutant particles. As, the pollution becomes a worldwide issue, it is one of the best method to alleviate this sky rocketing issue. For example, in Norway the government encourage the community to use bicycles and also provide special facilities like increase number of lanes in roads, subsidies the cost of bicycle etc. Thus, in Norway almost 85% using this bicycle for daily use. Hence No pollution and No traffic.
    On the flip side, people demanding for the improvement in infrastructure of the public transport. It is also reasonable because these transportation can accommodate more people at a time. So, it is easy for the citizen to travel on a daily basis especially, long distance. This also means that the insane traffic jam can reduce to a greater extend during rush hours and also plummet the road accidents. For instance, In Japan, the trams, trains, and buses are well flourished that all individuals depend on these public vehicles to commute. Thus the problem of traffic is reduced as well as people can relaxed during their journey also.
    To conclude, after discussing the above viewpoints I am of the opinion that both bicycles and public transportation are the need of an hour. So, government should utilize the fund on both.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *