Some People Say That Now We Can See Films On Our Phones And Tablets | Band 8 IELTS Essay Sample
Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Here is a band 8 IELTS essay on this topic written by one of our students. Need help with IELTS writing? Get your IELTS essays, letters and reports corrected by me.
Band 8 IELTS essay sample
The technological innovations are revolutionizing every industry including the cinema. Now we can watch movies on our mobile phones or tablets without having to go to the theatre. Some people argue that there is no need of the cinema now due to such advancements while others support the significance of the movie halls. I personally feel that a movie does not provide complete entertainment unless it is seen on a big screen.
There are several reasons that contribute to the popularity of mobile devices used for entertainment. First of all, these are convenient means and allow you to watch any of your favourite movie whenever you want. Secondly, it saves your time as you can use your spare time without having to stick to a full-fledged plan. Thirdly, you can save money because you do not have to purchase those expensive tickets and all you need is a handy device with an internet connection. Take Netflix and Amazon Prime as examples. They exactly provide all the mentioned benefits which make them a big hit among youth today.
Cinema halls, on the other hand, have their own aura and appeal. Bigger screens coupled with premium quality surround sound and comfortable sitting arrangements indeed make the movie more enjoyable. You plan the movie, spend money on tickets and watch it in a silent ambience; all these factors contribute to a distraction free movie experience. Additionally, going out of house or home for movies gives a break from the routine and monotonous life which gives people a more refreshing and relaxing experience.
To sum up, I believe to truly enjoy a movie one must go to a cinema hall because this is the only way to watch a movie free of distraction. Though this may seem an expensive option but every penny you spend is totally worth the experience you get out of it. Watching movies on mobile devices could be a viable option for many but the true essence of a movie still remains confined to theatres.
Technology is upgrading by leaps and bounds and few individuals believe that gadgets is the excellent mode to see movies instead of visiting cinemas. This essay would shed some light on both these views and then my opinion on the matter.
According to some section of the society people opine to use gadgets to watch movies as these days smart phones have been owned by everyone. Netflix is the epitome between youngsters, they prefer Web series as one can watch the movies On their own comfort. Survey conducted by TOI report : these days young boys and girls preference is of mobile phone as they can see movies in their free time and it is pocket friendly too.
Nevertheless others opine to visit cinemas as there are many benefits. Most imperative pros is they feel relaxed by watching a movie in the cinema. For example in my country, people who work from Monday to Saturday usually go to movies on Sunday as they feel relaxed and stress free and find themselves productive in a office while working. Moreover smartphones do not make them allure and majority young adults find interesting to watch on big screen.
I believe there are many movies which can cannot be entertaining when one watch
On television and new movies are to be made watch on cinemas as they are unavailable on Netflix or on prime. In addition screening plays crucial role , gadgets are the enemy of the health specially eyes.
To recapitulate, cinemas are the best to watch movies , whilst few movies can be seen on gadgets but they are being enjoyed by some youngsters or young adults.
This seems band 6.5 to me.
Technological advancement brought cineplex experience at our home. A portion of people prefer to watch movies on their mobile devices while other concure that theater expereince is more enjoyable. In this essay I shall analys both perspectives. However, I am personally in favor of later view.
It is clear that smart devices provides similar leisure experience as cinema. Moreover, Smartphone companies also focusing on providing big screen mobile phones and table for best viewing experience. As a result, people gets flexibility of time and place to watch movies or web seriesies. Having said that, they are becoming lazy and introvert by enjoyng alone. Based on recent survey, 60% of netflix users are from USA alone and government is planning for age limit also.
On the other hand, many people prefer cinema with their friends or family. Bigger screen coupled with high-tech music system connects viewers with emotions of the drama. I personally prefer to go to cineplexes because it alloews me to spend quality time with my loved once. It can be a small picnic for us. In addition, all of us can not afford all the latest technologies such as 4K TV or 3D glasses. So, cinema is the best affordable option to fulfil our needs. As an example, cineplexes in many developed cities are now a days providing 5D experience by adding haptic feedback in your seats.
In conclusion, Some people opine to watch it at their home on TV or tablets because of time constraints or preference. However, cinamtic experience gives opportunity to be with whom we want to, have a fun time and access of non-affordable technology.
This seems band 6.5 to me.
Nowadays, people make new friends through social media and internet chat groups. Some people think that it is good. Others think that face-to-face interaction is essential. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is an undeniable fact that the internet has revolutionized the way we communicate and form a friendship through online media and social groups. While some opine that this is the best way whereas others believe that face-to-face communication is imperative. Both the views, to some extent, are justified. However, in my opinion, the in-person way of imparting is best to a greater extent.
In this digitalization era, some people prefer online communication methods like Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, Snapchat, and many more. This is because of its greater speed and time-consuming benefit. In other words, a sedentary lifestyle has made our lives fully occupied with personal and professional work. As a result, it leaves us with no option to spare some quality time with our acquaintances. Hence, a social platform is the easiest and quickest way to grab an opportunity to make a phone call or involve in group chats.
On the contrary, there are various factors for those who would argue face-to-face communication is crucial. First of all, this form of interaction builds trust and confidence to form new relationships. Second, one can be more comfortable to understand the other person’s behavior and attributes. For example, according to a recent survey conducted among the 20-27 age-group population, it was found that people prefer to meet in person to decide marriage alliance. Finally, youngsters and children enhance to socialize with their immediate vicinity and society.
In conclusion, having considered both the views. Although online-based communication is on the rise nowadays, there is a higher number of people who choose face-to-face communication as an essential form to make a new relation. I strongly affirm with the latter view.
This is close to band 7.
Can you please suggest me a potential band for this essay:
Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
My answer:
People have different views about the importance of extinction of some species of biodiversity as opposed to other environmental problems. While the consequences of some species being lost are indeed dangerous, I believe that other natural issues could lead to even poorer conditions.
There are numerous hazards engendered by the loss of some certain species. As every creature has a crucial role in nature, disappearance of one has an effect on others. To go deeper, extermination of one kind of animals facilitates the loss of their predators. Furthermore, many endangered animals and plants are of high benefit for several companies. Hence, natural degradation has concerning drawbacks affecting the economy.
However, I think that there are even more hazardous environmental problems that could get the whole world into a big trouble. Firstly, worldwide temperature is increasing due to global warming caused by greenhouse gases emitted by cars and large factories substantially. This, in turn, is creating problems, such as melting of ice caps and, hence, riding of water levels, which is threatening the lives of people living close to shores. For instance, global temperature and overall water level rose by several units over the past decade. Also, a number of factors are resulting in high rates of pollution which is an essential reason for the drop in average life expectansy and the death of newborn babies.
In conclusion, I would argue that there are some environmental problems whose implications are more dangerous than those of natural extinction.
Thank you.
This seems band 7 to me.