Should Governments Spend Public Money On Saving Languages | Band 7.5 IELTS Essay Sample
Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Here is a band 7.5 IELTS essay on this topic submitted by one of our students. Need help with IELTS writing? Get your essays, letters and reports corrected by me.
Band 7.5 IELTS essay sample
It is true that languages play an important role in life. Some people argue that governments should invest money for preserving languages to avoid the loss of culture. However, I believe that spending money on saving endangered languages is unnecessary as governments should pay more attention to public services such as health care.
There is the commonly held view that governments should spend money on preventing languages from extinction so that a wide range of cultures can be protected / preserved. This is because each language usually represents one culture. For example, there are eleven types of indigenous languages in Taiwan and their mythology and ancient literature are written only in those respective languages. If these languages die out, part of their cultures will permanently vanish. However, it is widely known that the loss of minority languages does not significantly impact people’s lives as only a few people use them.
My strongly held belief is that governments should not waste money on saving endangered languages. It is evident that these languages are less valuable and less beneficial to people’s lives. Many studies show that saving a language will certainly cost a large amount of money and only a few people particularly linguistics can benefit from it and it increases the financial burden on a nation. By contrast, if governments can allocate more funds to the development of medical devices, they can certainly save many lives. Therefore, the government should focus on improving crucial sectors instead of wasting a lot of money to save local languages.
In conclusion, while it is true that saving local languages is crucial for conserving cultures associated with them, in my opinion, it is more important for the government to invest in essential services like healthcare and education. Hence, I am not in favour of spending a lot of money for saving languages.
Do you have an essay on this topic? Submit it below in the comments for a free band score estimate.
Nowadays, when people tend to make everything easy or widely accessible some languages seem to bounce on the edge of extinction. Some people believe that governments should endow saving the languages, using public money, while others consider that idea a waste of governmental means.
To begin with, languages form a crucial part of our culture. It has been proven that, knowing more than one language can improve ones’ cognitive skills. Moreover, it affects the way we perceive others and our cultural heritage. The process of learning another language develops the society in many ways, so the supporters of spending money on preventing languages from extinction, opt for spending public money on it.
On the contrary, others may find this idea galling. It. Is caused due to the fact, there clearly are some more important social issues, which should have a priority to receive means for their development. Among them, education and health care can be distinguished. If the money, spend on languages was received by them, they would have improved the status of life for many people.
In my opinion, albeit it may seem impossible, the balance between spendings on each sector needs to be found. Not only should the government take languages into consideration while planning expenditure, but also they should give all of the sectors (education, healthcare, languages) similar amounts of money. It would enable saving a cultural heritage, but also improve the general living condition of citizens.
In conclusion, saving local languages is crucial and can be easily done, without excluding other important public institutions.
This seems band 6.5 to me.