Science Will Soon Make People Live Up To 100 Or 200 Years | Band 8 IELTS Essay Sample

Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some believe this is a good thing while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Here is a band 8 IELTS essay on this topic submitted by one of our students. Need help with IELTS writing? Get your IELTS essays, letters and reports corrected by me.

Band 8 IELTS essay sample

It is frequently believed that advancements in science will eventually lead people on the earth to have a lifespan of about a century or even more than that. While some people agree with this, there are others who strongly disagree with it. In my opinion, this increase in the lifespan of humans will aggravate the existing world problems further.

On the one hand, some believe that people should live for a 100 years or even more than that as it will help them to stay with their loved ones for an extended period of time . As there will be fewer deaths, the world will be a better place to live in with no sorrows and sadness over the death of the near ones. Moreover, the life span of intelligent and genius people can be extended which will help the world get more knowledgeable people and they can offer their guidance through their experiences of life to the upcoming generations.

However, the aforementioned benefits are negligible when we consider the downsides of living forever. To start with, after people reach the age of 75 or 80 they have hardly anything left to do or experience. This will make their lives monotonous. In addition, this trend will lead to population explosion and will be detrimental to already existing global problems like food shortage, pollution and global warming, water crisis, accommodation issues and traffic congestion to mention some. The world resources will be depleted at a much faster rate with more people simultaneously consuming them. Another aspect to this is that with more proportion of population in elderly group the government will need to invest more for social benefits of old people and this will affect the economy of the nation.

To conclude, people may vary in their opinion, but I think that science should not go against the law of nature and extend the lifespan of humans as it will worsen the economy and environment of the world.

Do you have an essay on this topic? Submit it below in the comments for a free band score estimate.

Manjusha Nambiar

Hi, I'm Manjusha. This is my blog where I give IELTS preparation tips.

2 Responses

  1. Frances says:

    It is matter of time before people are able to use science to extend life. While some individuals are in favour of this opinion, others believe otherwise. In my opinion, prolonging life with the use of science will be detrimental to everyone.

    Firstly, science is a result of experimenting with facts and there is nothing natural about it. High Tech equipments have been produced by different companies to treat diseases and manage existing illnesses that in the end, life expectations are reduced giving rise to older generations who live with 4 or more chronic diseases. Hence, Tax payers money is spent by the government in providing for the care and support of the elderly. Moreover, Improving life expectancy will give rise to depression and suicidal tendencies when an individual has a poor quality life. An example is a woman with four chronic conditions including arthritis that has gotten her bedridden. She will eventually want to be put out of her misery to reduce the burden on her family. Also, some Patients who have had near death experiences and were resuscitated with the aid of science recover with some lingering pain, fractures, deformities and so many complications.

    On the other hand, going against nature to prolong lives will give families optimal time to spend with their loved ones. This will enable them impart as much information and knowledge as they can before their demise. Furthermore, great minds like Albert Einstein, Charles Darwin and the likes would have been able to get more work done and their foot prints, permanently marked if people were to live to 100 to 200 years.

    In conclusion, life is a precious gift and is meant to be lived, therefore, extending life with the use of science will undermine that therefore, I strongly believe that nature should be nurtured and people allowed to live well without interference.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *