Nowadays, Many People Choose To Be Self-employed | Band 8 IELTS Essay Sample
Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisation. Why might this be the case? What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed?
Here is a band 8 IELTS essay on this topic written by one of our students. Need help with IELTS writing? Get your IELTS essays, letters and reports corrected by me. Follow us on Youtube for IELTS writing tips.
Band 8 IELTS essay sample
Instead of working for a big company or an organization, many people prefer to be self-employed. There are many reasons why they prefer this; however, it comes with some disadvantages.
Today a lot of people choose to be self-employed because it gives them a sense of independence and dignity. There is no one to give orders and boss around which is quite common in a corporation as they are hell bent on meeting the targets set by their boards. Meanwhile, in a self-employed job, the targets can be more realistic and humane. Firstly, the working hours can be flexible and altered whenever required. This reduces the work stress and also permits the person to spend more quality time with their loved ones. Secondly, they can take holidays or a day off whenever they want which is the biggest incentive of being self-employed. Secondly, the profits increase as they do not have to share the revenue with anyone. Furthermore, the tax breaks for small businesses are very helpful.
Although being self-employed has its perks, there are quite a few drawbacks. Self-employed businesses are usually small or medium scale and sometimes they do not have insurance. This makes the business risky in case of an unforeseen event like a pandemic, natural calamity or market fluctuation. Unlike in a big company, there are very few people to help navigate through difficult situations, especially if some legal problems occur. Doing everything oneself can turn out to be challenging. For example, if a doctor runs his own hospital he will have to look after the day to day functioning of the hospital in addition to treating patients. This can not only be stressful for him but also compromise the quality of services he provides. Furthermore, it becomes difficult to find well qualified staff due to the limited resources that the small businesses have. Lastly, one can miss out on an opportunity to work on a life changing project like sending a rocket to Mars as these projects are often taken up by big organizations.
To conclude, I feel that many people choose to be self-employed these days to have a better work life balance and enjoy more time with their family and friends. Though it can be quite rewarding, it definitely has some disadvantages and obstacles.
In many situations, people who break the law should be warned instead of punished.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many nowadays are of the opinion, that law-breakers should be warned rather than punished. I largely disagree with this statement, but with certain exceptions, mostly related to the social aspects.
The proponents of the warning system for modern offenders often point to the numerous advantages of such a modern trend.. To begin with, the fact that minor offenders who committed the crime occasionally, but receive permanent records have a great chance to be isolated from the civil world, as they will struggle to find a high-quality job with or pass through secondary education and obtain a useful degree. This means that they could be encouraged to starts their crime career to support all their family members well dressed and feed.
Those who will be punished more heavily and pass through the jail term have a chance to create useful bonds with the prisoner population and continue their crime career in the civil world by the involve themselves in the gag bands, ultimately leading to an increasing amount of crime in communities.
Nevertheless, despite some valuable arguments listed above, the aforementioned facts could be useful only in rare circumstances, while the main deterrent instrument to decrease the number of crimes is a strict punishment. If the law-offender will be aware of the absence of punishment for certain minor crimes he or she will continue to commit the crime again and again and show their antisocial behavior or even encourage others to misbehave and act violently towards others. In contrast, the fair of being punished will stop most extreme cases and provides the minimum safety in contemporary society. As nowadays majority of the current planet dweller densely packed in downtowns of the megalopolises strict punishment for the middle and heavy crimes is only one useful instrument to provide a peaceful condition for the city citizens. Punishment will allocate most violent individuals from the most vulnerable members of our society like ladies and teens, which eventually will have a positive influence on further humankind development both in social and economical aspects.
In conclusion, while a warning system could be useful in certain circumstances, in the major of cases only strict punishment will curb crime rates and discourage re-offenders from further crimes. An effective combination warning system with strict rules could yield both economic and social dividends and decrease the number of law-breakers.
This seems band 6.5 to me.
Many nowadays are of the opinion that friends should be chosen according to the same point of view on the most significant issues, while others believe that it could be boring and even harmful, so it is better to choose a friend with the opposite opinion. Although there are some crucial points to support the first opinion, in my perspective friend with the contrast opinion is more beneficial.
On the one hand, a friend with the same opinion could easily support you at various points of life through adulthood. If your friend and you have the same point of view on many crucial issues it is more likely to build a warm, strong friendship with the individual who will support you in any circumstances. Unfortunately, such kind o friendship could be possible only in childhood or youth when the youngsters share the same feelings and study in the one faculty in the college.
Nevertheless, despite some strong arguments and positive details listed above share the same point of view with one person for a long time could be boring and even harmful. If some will always will have the same opinion from you on a crucial issue you will never will rig of the bad habits and improve yourself. In contrast, the friend who has the opposite point of view could be beneficial as he or she will look at a certain issue from a different angle and sport the hidden drawbacks of a particular thing or habit. For example, if the two friends have opposite views on one particular issue like a family or job, they have a chance to dispute these issues and came to useful pragmatic conclusions.
In conclusion, despite some tangible benefits of having friends with the same opinion, in most of cases is more essential to possess friends with the contrasting view, as it allows both individuals to look on the main crucial issues from the different points of view and adopt some useful solution where it si necessary
This seems band 6.5 to me.