Many High Level Positions In Companies Are Filled By Men | Band 9 IELTS Essay Sample

Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 per cent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. To what extent do you agree?

Here is a band 9 IELTS essay on this topic. Need help with IELTS writing module? Get your IELTS essays, letters and reports corrected by me.

Band 9 IELTS Essay Sample

In many countries now the workforce consists of more women than men. Yet, there are few women in managerial positions. Hence, some people argue that a certain number of senior level positions should be reserved for women. In my opinion, this is not a viable solution because it will benefit neither women nor the organizations hiring them.

Reserving jobs on the basis of gender benefits none. It will ensure that women can easily climb up the corporate ladder because there are positions reserved for them. Unfortunately, this will discourage them from achieving higher education or working hard. Hence, instead of reserving seats for women, girls should be taught from an early age that they too can become a manager or a CEO if they wish because the opportunities are there regardless of their genders. Furthermore, imposing a quota will only encourage companies to find another way to outsmart the system. For example, a company can change the title of a position to just fill a vacancy. For these reasons, women are not benefited when jobs / positions are reserved for them at the workplace.

On the other hand, it is important for the company to be able to employ the best available candidate for the positions. When there are no gender based quotas, it will ensure that the most talented people get to the top. Moreover, companies that hire the best people for the right positions tend to be more successful. This in turn will create more opportunities available within the company and then the company can hire more people including women to fill the additional available positions. Thus it is evident that reserving managerial positions for women is not the right solution to ensure gender equality at the workplace.

In conclusion, since forcing companies to hire more women just to follow the law can only cause more harm than good, I strongly believe that companies should be able to hire people based on their qualifications, and not gender.

Do you have an essay on this topic? Submit it below in the comments for a free band score estimate.

Manjusha Nambiar

Hi, I'm Manjusha. This is my blog where I give IELTS preparation tips.

9 Responses

  1. Najeeb says:

    Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. To what extent do you agree?

    It has been observed that most of the high ranking officials in companies are men. In spite of the fact that women are more than half of the working people in the developed countries. The argument that a fixed number of these positions should be reserved for women does not seem sensible to me. In my opinion, the job should be given to the best possible people, however, there can be some exceptions to it.

    The companies should employ the system of a meritocracy. This means that selection should be made based on the skills they possess rather than based on gender, color, or race. Besides, when a competent person is at the helm of a company, it is more likely to succeed. Thus, creating more jobs in society. However, once people are hired, they should be taken care of based on their needs. For example, a company should provide women with maternity leaves, so they can take care of themselves.

    When it comes to selecting government officials, there should be a specific quota for the women. As women in high ranking positions will be able to work on the problems at grassroots. To illustrate, not only laws for women protection will be easier to pass, but also other women will get motivated by them. So, it makes sense to have a mandatory women representation in the parliaments.

    To sum up, while meritocracy should be used for hiring, there are some areas like parliament where women should get a fixed quota. The idea of forcing the companies to allocate certain positions to women does not appeal to me, and I do not agree with it.

  2. Forouzan says:

    Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 per cent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women.
    To what extent do you agree?
    As we see in most companies especially in developed country Half of the employees are women, however, they have a few portion in top-level positions and Most of the these positions are occupied by men. I believe that determined percentage of these positions should be considered for women as they are great leaders naturally and characteristically.
    Women are great leaders in terms of their nature. First of all, Most women are naturally empathetic and value relationships. This enables them to have a strong understanding of what drives and motivates people, and how to acknowledge different people for their performance. Secondly, they are naturally nurturing, one of the key aspects of leadership is the ability to help the team members and develop their own skills and strengths to helping them succeed. Finally, Women make great leaders as they are natural multitaskers. The ability to decisively and quickly respond to simultaneous and different tasks or problems at a time is a critical component to successful leadership.
    Furthermore, they have got some amazing traits which make them suitable for leadership or management. They are strong communicators, for instance, Female business leaders are able to communicate regularly, clearly and openly as it is a woman’s strongest skill and female leaders know how to use it! Whether communicating with employers, co-workers, or partners, an open communication stream allows for clarity in executing roles and responsibilities. In addition, Emotional intelligence is something that has recently gained momentum as an essential leadership behavior. To truly create a great place to work and to get the best of employees, demonstrating emotional intelligence as a leader is critical.
    All in all, according to the issues mentioned above, I agree to allocate more top positions to women as they are efficient and make great positive change in companies.

  3. SG says:

    Most high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 per cent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. Do you agree?

    ————————————————————————————————————————————-

    A recent study shows that even though 50 percentage of the workforce is women still it’s the men who make it to the high-level positions in the organisations around the world. In my opinion, organisations should allocate a certain number of positions to the women.

    Women in their personal and professional life take up many roles and responsibilities, in addition they have been outperforming in every field. However, it’s been observed in a survey that it’s the men who sit at the table when it’s about a job promotion. A lot of women don’t feel confident enough to take up certain roles, as a study showed that women get take care of 60 percent of other responsibilities outside work and men in comparison take 40% of such tasks. Women have to look after the home, children, meals, kitchen, groceries, bills etc. This make the women not set up and ask for additional responsibilities even if they are skilled and capable of a promotion to a higher level..

    Inorder for women to grow and become leaders, companies should define a certain percentage of positions for women. This will not be beneficial to the company but also would be good for a country. If there are positions and opportunities for women to grow within the organisation, they will be able to contribute with their talent and knowledge. Mrs. Sonia Gandhi is a political leader in India and a role model for many women in India. Kiran Bedi, sub-inspector is also known for her work in the country. Women can do wonders if they get the right platform and right opportunities at the workplace and treated at par.

    In conclusion, though men and women perform extremely well and work hard in all companies, it’s the men who get to the higher levels. It would be appropriate for these companies to design their company policies in such a manner that women also can grow to higher levels..

  4. Bohdan says:

    Even despite the fact that women constitute half of the workforce in many nations in the developed world, a considerable part of high-positioned managers is men. Therefore, companies should devote a certain part of these positions to female employees. I agree with this statement because men and women have equal rights, and, very often, women’s natural characteristics make them better supervisors.
    Because of equality of both genders, the ratio between male and female in company’s management should be the same. Although there is a popular stereotype that men are better supervisors than women, we all were brought to this world with equal rights, and therefore, all people, despite the gender, should have equal opportunities in a job in particular. For example, recently, the USA government imposed a law that forbidden companies to have only male management team.
    Because of women natural uniqueness, which helps them to be better directors than men, they should constitute a certain part of company’s high-level positions. In some situations, our birth features have a serious impact on our decision. Consequently, women, who are better prone to be directors, need to have bigger chances to show their capabilities. To illustrate this, recent research concluded that teams that were managed by females are 15% more productive than teams that have a male supervisor.
    In conclusion, companies should promote more women to higher positions because both male and female have the right to this, and women are better managers because of their natural features.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *