Increasing The Price Of Petrol Is The Best Way To Solve Traffic Problems | Band 8 And 7.5 IELTS Essay Samples
Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
Here is a band 8 IELTS Essay on this topic submitted by one of our students. Send us your writing samples for a free band score estimate or get a detailed analysis of your writing for a fee.
Band 8 IELTS essay sample
Indeed, growing traffic density and pollution have become alarming issues in the contemporary world. It is suggested that the price of petrol / oil should be hiked. In my opinion, this is not a very effective method and alternative steps should be taken to address these issues.
On the one hand, raising / hiking / increasing the cost of petrol would encourage travellers to adopt other cost-effective means of transportation such as public transit and cycles. If petrol is unaffordable, people are less likely to use their private vehicles frequently. Along with number of private vehicles plying on the roads, the level of obnoxious gases exhausted by them will also reduce / plummet, leading to cleaner air. Obviously, there are some environmental benefits to increasing the cost of fuel.
On the other hand, this is not a viable solution because it will only affect the poor and middle class people. If petrol becomes unaffordable, they will be forced to use public transport. At the same time, rich people who own most of the cars will continue to drive their personal vehicles. Raising the cost of fuel will also make essential commodities more expensive and that will be another blow for poor people. In my opinion, a better solution is to improve the infrastructure. Roads should be widened and more flyovers should be built. The government should also encourage businesses to move their offices to the suburbs or rural areas as this measure will help to decongest cities.
In conclusion, raising the cost of petrol might help to some extent, but it is not a viable solution as its downsides outweigh the advantages. In my opinion, improving the road infrastructure in cities and developing smaller towns are more effective ways to decongest cities and solve traffic problems.
Band 7.5 IELTS essay sample
Traffic congestion and pollution have become major problems worldwide. Pollution is particularly worse in the big cities. While it is possible that higher petrol prices will solve the traffic and pollution problems to a great extent, raising the price of oil is not the best solution. However, I believe that other measures are more effective.
The main reason why raising the fuel prices is not the right solution is that it is the short-term measure. Although it might cut the number of vehicles on the road, it largely affects the prices of food and other goods. For instance, in India, my home country, everything relies on the transport. If petrol prices increase, the prices of commodities in the market will also increase. This will lead to inflation in the market which has a big domino impact on what people end up paying even for a slice of bread.
A better solution is to find measures that will work in the long run. To illustrate, escalating the investment in alternative fuels and improving public transport are more effective measures than increasing petrol prices. Traffic and pollution problems will not be solved until people start using the public transport. For this reason, the government should make public transport available at cheap rates and prohibit cars from city centres.
To conclude, this essay discussed how the growing population and worsening air quality have made it imperative for governments and people to adopt change and cut the use of private transport. However, in my opinion, increasing the cost of petrol is not the right solution for traffic congestion. Instead of taking this drastic measure, governments should invest in public transport and clean fuel.
Do you have an essay on this topic? Submit it below in the comments for a free band score estimate.
Traffic jams and pollution have become worldwide concerns and people are brainstorming in order to find a solution. It has become a topic of debate that increasing the prices of fuel will solve this problem. However, I believe that such decision can have adverse consequences on other adjoining factors related to fuel & pollution. Alternatively, we should be looking at other options to deal with this problem.
If the prices rise of fuel, then this will lead to inflation of other necessary commodities. The number of cars on roads may reduce and pollution may subside too, but in such scenario the food prices will go up and which in turn, will cause inflation. Transport is the bloodline of the cities and towns to provide many necessary things accesible to people and this will get impacted if such measures of price increase will be taken. At large, the purchasing power parity will decrease and consumer will feel suffocated while meeting both the ends.
However, different alternative methods can be adopted by the government and population in order to limit the number of vehicles to avoid traffic congestion. For instance, if the public transport can be improved in terms of facilities and fair then this can bring positive change. Also, like trains if different compartment can be customised for carrying industrial goods then inter-city transport of bulk goods can cause decrease in quantity of commercial vehicles in cities. Lastly, the research department should be investing in finding alternative fuels which cause less damage to environment and can be cheaper to attract consumers.
To conclude, the perspective above discusses the different approach to one issue of saving environment and avoiding time waste during traffic jam. Hence, rather than taking the drastic step of increasing fuel price and making the economy vulnerable, other methods can be thought of, like better & cost effective public transport & substitutes of existing fuels.
This seems a band 6.5 to me. Your ideas are all good. Work on your grammar.
Connections are vital for living in this congested cosmos. Everyone is attached to one another by any relation or for any purpose.similarly,there is a great relationship between humans and environment. But, in this loving relation individuals do not play with loyalty. Our surroundings avail for us as much as they can. But man uses the natural things unconditionaly which leads towards many hazardous issues. For instance, global warming, pollution and etc that may cause many incurable diseases or even may leads to death also. To overcome, one should use the environmental material with very care because anything beyond limits are always unhealthy. If that cannot possible by local people then government should take essential steps like increase the fuel prices but to some extent.
Here this can be intro??
And if there are only talk about about pollution not about traffic…..
No. This is a bad introduction. Just rewrite the given question in your own words in the introduction and express your opinion.