Human Activity Has Had A Negative Impact On Plants And Animals | Band 8 IELTS Essay Sample

Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Here is a band 8 IELTS essay on this topic written by one of our students. Need help with IELTS writing? Get your IELTS essays, letters and reports corrected by me.

Band 8 IELTS essay sample

World population has increased greatly over the last few decades and industrialization has posed a major threat to wild species these days. While some argue that this trend cannot be stopped, others including myself believe that we still have time to tackle the issue.

People who hold the opinion that we should accept the current situation base their argument on several reasons. To begin with, many places with serious environmental problems are already not suitable for some species to survive. For example, many wild animals lost their habitats because of deforestation and both water and air pollution brought by industrialization, especially in some developing countries. It is simply impractical to shut down these factories as some local governments give top priority to economic development. In addition, some problems are too complicated to be solved in a short period of time. Global warming is one of them. Some marine lives, for instance, are dying out because of increased temperature and there is nothing we can do to make a quick change.

However, others believe that governments and individuals can still make efforts to save wild lives. Governments could introduce environmental laws to force factories to reduce carbon dioxide emissions that lead to global warming, and they can also impose green taxes on drivers to encourage people to drive less. As a result, less greenhouse gas emission from both factories and car use will lead to a better environment for both human and wild species. As for individuals, we can also limit our contribution to environmental damage by becoming more energy efficient. For instance, if paperless offices were widely encouraged and adopted, then there would be less demand for wood, and thus helping to curb deforestation and better protect wild habitats. 

In my opinion, saving wild animals and plants can be quite challenging and will not be an easy task, but we still have time to take measures to change the situation. With the joint efforts of governments and individuals, environmental issues are likely to be at least mitigated.

Do you have an essay on this topic? Submit it below in the comments for a free band score estimate.

Manjusha Nambiar

Hi, I'm Manjusha. This is my blog where I give IELTS preparation tips.

2 Responses

  1. Yeu says:

    Biodiversity depletion due to human actions has been a global problem for centuries. While some individuals reckon that the detrimental effects on flora and fauna caused by humans is inevitable, others argue that some measures can be put in place to change this predicament. In this essay I will discuss both arguments and give my opinion for the latter view.

    On the one hand, people think that it’s difficult to deal with human actions like deforestation due to load shedding which is more prominent in developing countries as well as increase in the world population. To elaborate, as a result of economic hardships in third world countries, loadshedding occurs more frequently hence citizens are forced to cut down trees as a source of energy and lighting. For example, gumtrees are usually the most vulnerable as they are a good source of energy. Nevertheless, poaching of endangered animals is necessitated by poverty. To be more specific, due to poverty, people are left with no option but to poach for animals such as elephants and rhinoceroses so as to trade the for money to earn a decent living.
    On the other hand, it is very possible to tackle this problem by either government intervention or financial or food aid from developed countries. To clarify, the government can impose stringent punishment to those found endangering plants or animals. For example, a hefty penalty to individuals found poaching, this deterring other aspiring criminals. Additionally, developed countries such as America and UK can provide food or financial assistance to destitute families in developing nations so that they refrain from over exploiting the land.
    In conclusion I opine that negative impact on plants and animals caused by reckless human behaviour can be prevented not only by imposing a hefty penalty, but also the interference of rich countries.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *