Government Investment In The Arts Is A Waste Of Money | Band 8 IELTS Essay Sample

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Here is a band 8 IELTS essay on this topic submitted by one of our students. Need help with IELTS writing? Get your task 1 and task 2 writing samples corrected by me.

Band 8 IELTS essay sample

It is argued that governments are wasting their resources by paying for the preservation of arts and that they would be better off spending the funds on public sectors. While it is crucial to increase spending on public services such as education or transportation, governments should not cut all their expenses on arts.

On the one hand, improving public services is crucial for the development of a country. For example, when the funds are utilised for traffic projects like road maintenance or public transportation, the number of traffic accidents will reduce, and people can plan their trips better around the city thanks to frequent bus and train services. Furthermore, with sufficient funding, the authorities can keep public workers happy and avoid their going on strikes. Imagine all teachers in a city stop teaching for a day to protest against low wages. It would lead to classes being cancelled, and parents having to stay home to look after their schoolchildren. That would be a very troublesome / difficult situation for families and offices alike.

On the other hand, it is equally important to spend on arts. If the officials decided to stop spending on music and theatre, it would be a serious mistake and could result in the loss of national identity. We all know that arts and culture are interrelated. If a country does not emphasize on preserving arts, the cultural aspects associated with traditional music and theatre will gradually disappear. The nation will in turn lose their cultural uniqueness, which is of great importance for tourism. If travellers find nothing extraordinary about a culture, it is less likely that they will make that country their desired destination.

In conclusion, I am against the idea of governments cutting all investment in arts to spend on public services. The authorities should balance their spending between these two sectors so public services can operate smoothly and at the same time cultural diversity and uniqueness can be maintained.

Do you have an essay on this topic? Submit it below in the comments for a free band score estimate.

Related posts:

  1. Band 8 IELTS Essay Sample | Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere
  2. Some People Think That The Government Is Wasting Money On Arts | Band 7.5 IELTS Essay Sample
  3. The Government Is Wasting Money On Arts And This Money Could Be Better Spent Elsewhere | Band 8 IELTS Essay Sample
  4. Should Government Spend Money On Arts When They Have So Many Other Important Issues | Band 9 IELTS Essay Sample
  5. Band 9 essay sample | Government should stop wasting money on arts
  6. Should Governments Spend Public Money On Saving Languages | Band 7.5 IELTS Essay Sample
  7. IELTS Essay: Are public celebrations a waste of money?
  8. Band 7 IELTS Essay Sample | International Sporting Events Are A Waste Of Money And Time
  9. Band 7.5 IELTS Essay Sample | In order to solve traffic problems government should tax private cars owners heavily and use the money to improve public transport
  10. In Order To Solve Traffic Problems, Governments Should Tax Private Car Owners Heavily And Use The Money To Improve Public Transportation | Band 8 IELTS Essay Sample

Manjusha Nambiar

Hi, I'm Manjusha. This is my blog where I give IELTS preparation tips.

4 Responses

  1. Sarbjeet Singh says:

    Some people believe that the government should give precedence to public services over arts in terms of investment. While development in public sectors is imperative, I believe that the financial quota of arts should not be negligible.

    The development in domains suchs as transportation, health and education is a sign of developed countries. The members of public, who are satisfied from the quality of life that they are living, always contribute behind their limits to strengthen the economy of native country. As a result, this gives a boost to the economy of country. For example, the government of Chandigarh, India has invested ten million in the public transportation system in year 2010. As a result, it has mitigated the problem of traffic congestion to a large extent and made journeys of people comfortable. Thus, it is crucial to spend money on public infrastructures.

    Arts like music and drama are important parts of the culture. In this digital age, individuals are inclined towards the science and artificial intelligence developments and pay only little attention to these areas. Thus, countries are loosing their diversity and identities which are the major attractions for tourists. Hence, it has become necessary for the civic authorities to make people aware about the importance of music and theatre which is only possible with a huge amount of investment.

    In conlusion, in my opinion, although development in public services is important for the betterment of country, but investment in arts also essential and it is not a waste of money.

  2. Farhan Abbas says:

    Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

    It is generally argued that the authorities instead of spending in arts and cultural activities should divert their available resources towards social welfare activities. While acknowledging the significance of social services like health and education, I believe that arts hold its own unique importance and must be taken care of in the budget allocation process.

    It is the prime duty of every government to provide basic necessities of life to its citizens. These include health, education, sanitation, roads and infrastructure services, to name a few. All these requirements of society are met by hiring a large work-force and purchasing materials, thus consuming a major portion of Government revenues. For the same reason, some developed nations like Canada and Australia mark education and health as their top priority and invest heavily on that account. Hence the investment in general welfare is inevitable and society could not survive without these amenities.

    Besides spending on public services, authorities must ensure to allocate sufficient resources for the arts and cultural activities like music, fine arts, films and theatre. The investment is not only obvious to maintain the earning cycle of performers and artists but also ensures the satisfaction of the aesthetic desire of masses. Moreover, keeping the arts and cultural values alive and introducing them to the new generations is vital for every nation. For instance, an art exhibition or a historical movie provides an excellent opportunity to not only relive the glorious past but also helps commemorate the efforts of our ancestors.

    In conclusion, it is reiterated to mention that investment of public funds on social welfare activities as well as in arts promotion is mandatory, therefore, I believe that the government must maintain the delicate balance between the two inevitable. If properly managed, the situation can prove extremely beneficial for both the nation and its citizens.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *