In Britain When Someone Gets Old They Often Go To Live In An Old Age Home | Band 7.5 IELTS Essay Sample

In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care. Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Here is a band 7.5 IELTS essay on this topic written by one of our students. Need help with IELTS writing? Get your IELTS essays, letters and reports corrected by me.

Band 7.5 IELTS essay sample

When the joint family concept was prominent in Britain five decades ago, the aged were taken care of by their children at their residence. With the advent of the nuclear family, living in retirement homes has become the norm. I believe that the cost of this care should be borne by the government instead of the respective families. This essay will delve more into this topic.

Aging is an essential aspect of human life and a peaceful stage too. In this modern age, young adults do not have the time or means to take care of their elders. As a result, the aged are left with no choice other than opting for retirement t homes. With the passage of time, the cost of living is increasing enormously. Consequently, it has become an uphill task for the youngsters to provide elderly care / eldercare. Also, it results in ill-treatment of the old or harassment in a few cases. Such incidents are happening in more than 78% of the families when funds are to be provided by the near and dear for such care.

The government, on the other hand, can take care of seniors because it has the resources to do. When these people were young, they paid taxes and it is the responsibility of the government to allocate a small part of that money for their care when they become old. If the government pays of the elderly population, they can be assured of a stress free retirement life. This in turn boosts their overall sense of well-being and stops people from worrying too much about their twilight years.

To conclude, in light of the arguments mentioned above, I believe that retirement homes have to be fully funded by the government.

Related posts:

  1. In Britain When Someone Gets Old They Often Go To Live In A Home With Other Old People | Band 8 IELTS Essay Sample
  2. In Britain When Someone Gets Old They Often Go To Live In A Home With Other Old People | Band 7.5 IELTS Essay Sample
  3. IELTS essay: Who should pay for senior care?
  4. Some Believe That Elderly People Should Live In Nursing Homes; Others Think They Should Live With Their Family | Band 8 IELTS Essay Sample
  5. Nowadays Some Old People Choose To Live In The Retirement Communities With Other People | Band 8 IELTS Essay Sample
  6. IELTS Band 7 Essay Samples: Should the government take care of the elderly?
  7. Some People Are Leaving The Countryside To Live In Cities And Towns | Band 7.5 IELTS Essay Sample
  8. Band 7.5 IELTS Essay Sample | People Are Living Longer. Is This A Positive Development Or Negative Development?
  9. People Are Living Longer So The Retirement Age Should Be Raised | Band 7.5 IELTS Essay Sample
  10. IELTS writing test in India: Should people plan for their retirement?

Manjusha Nambiar

Hi, I'm Manjusha. This is my blog where I give IELTS preparation tips.

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. Nithish says:

    Some cities do not restrict how big, stylish and unique houses and offices that people construct can be. Do you think the advantages of this approach outweigh the disadvantages?

    It is quite common in many cities to not impose any regulations on how to build a house or an office. Consequently, many individuals tend to build giant, stylish and different buildings. I believe, although it has some benefits, there are many drawbacks associated with this condition and this essay will elaborate on the same in the following paragraphs with relevant examples.

    To begin with, construction of buildings according to personal preferences has many adverse effects on society. When there are no rules to build a house, greedy people would build larger houses to earn more money through rent from tenants. Needless to say, skyscrapers and tall buildings block ventilation to other houses around them. This, in turn, may have a negative impact on the mood of the people who cannot access natural light. For instance, according to a survey conducted by Deccan Chronicle, residents who live in houses without adequate sunlight and natural air are more likely to be succumbed by depression. Alongside this, it may also lead people to develop a weak immune system that cannot fight seasonal colds and fevers due to less exposure to sunlight that imparts vitamin D.

    Of course, there are also some advantages of not having any limitations to construct buildings. Especially those who are creative and desire to build attention-worthy buildings can take advantage of this condition and make models that stand as an inspiration to amateur architects and people who are in the sector of construction and buildings. To exemplify, a renowned city in India, Mumbai does not levy any rules to build houses. Thus, the Ambani family constructed a 12 storey building with the help of cutting edge technology and sophisticated mechanisms to carve it as a symbol of elegance.

    To conclude, having no restrictions to build constructions may enable some people to create innovative designs but it has many damaging effects on people’s health and mood.